It’s always exciting to see new voices break into cinema, especially within horror. For more than a century, the genre has given filmmakers a space to channel fears and anxieties that often reflect the world around them, whether consciously or not. Because of that, horror history doubles as a timeline of cultural unease, showing how real-world events and shifting social tensions shape the nightmares audiences connect with in the moment.

That’s part of what makes Curry Barker’s Obsession such an interesting watch. Barker first gained attention through independently released internet projects, and Obsession marks his first major feature film production. Backed in part by Blumhouse, the film is ambitious, high-concept, and technically polished. It stands among the stronger Blumhouse releases of recent years while also signaling significant potential for Barker moving forward as a filmmaker.

What stands out most about Obsession, however, is how directly it taps into the anxieties of its generation, particularly young men. Beneath the horror framework, the film explores isolation, insecurity, and obsession in ways that feel current rather than exaggerated. That underlying tension gives the movie a level of relevance that lingers long after its scares fade.

---

TOP FIVE ABOUT “OBSESSION”

5. The Opening Act is Lean

Barker took on multiple roles throughout the production, serving as the film’s sole credited writer, director, and editor. Starting with the screenplay, the writing is consistently compelling. Barker does a strong job of grounding the film’s high-concept premise in a believable reality, allowing the story to feel emotionally tangible even as the chaos escalates. He also maintains a steady tonal balance throughout the film, blending genuine horror with moments of sharp, pitch-black humor that land naturally rather than feeling forced.

One of the film’s biggest strengths is its opening act. A concept like this could have easily resulted in a cluttered introduction overloaded with exposition and awkward character setup before the story truly began. Instead, Barker throws the audience directly into motion. That decision gives the first act a much stronger sense of momentum and immersion.

Rather than simply explaining character relationships and conflicts through dialogue, the film allows viewers to experience them in real time. The emotional dynamics are not just communicated, they are felt. That approach makes the early tension more effective and gives the escalating horror a stronger foundation once the story fully spirals outward.

4. The Final Act is Mean

I don’t mean to undersell the first two-thirds of Obsession, which are very good, but the film is relatively light on anything resembling gruesome genre fare for most of its runtime. That is, until the final act, which sees Barker and company fully commit and push the gore factor to another level.

There is a critical turning point in the film where it feels like a specific character basically dropkicks open the door to this portion of the story, and it is incredibly effective at both ruthlessly raising the stakes and being genuinely upsetting. It had my entire theater literally gasping, which is a compliment in and of itself.

3. Barker’s Direction is Solid

Throughout the film, the visual language that Barker and cinematographer Taylor Clemons craft feels motivated, concentrated, and distinct. This pairs extremely well with Barker’s strong grasp of the film’s editing, particularly in the way audio, both Rock Burwell’s score and the sound design, contributes to the construction of each scene, falling in and out of synchrony in interesting and affecting ways.

I will note that the gimmick of suddenly pulling the soundscape out to underline the awkwardness of a moment is perhaps a bit overused in the first act. If it had been a drinking game, I would have been completely sloshed by act two.

That said, the film as a whole demonstrates Barker’s boldness and ability to tap into something genuinely invasive. There’s a set piece late in the film where the characters are all at a house party, and the sequence heavily relies on reaction shots from the surrounding guests. Those moments bring the scene to life. A less confident filmmaker probably would not have lingered on those kinds of grace notes, but in Barker’s hands, those beats are foregrounded, and the sequence is much stronger because of it.

2. Inde Navarrette’s Performance is Great

All of the performers in Obsession are good. James Harris is doing some really impressive work in the lead role. Andy Richter is a surprise scene-stealer. But far and away, the real star of the film is Inde Navarrette as Nikki. Though audiences only get a few passing minutes with the ‘real’ Nikki, Navarrette is able to make her into a fully formed and instantly recognizable character within that time. She is the girl next door, and it is the grounding of this performance that makes the insanity of the rest of the film really work.

Because once the One Wish Willow is snapped and Nikki becomes properly ‘obsessed,’ things go off the deep end quickly, and Navarrette is tasked with going full-blown insane. It’s a big performance full of big beats, all of which are impressive, but what’s even more impressive is the way in which she consistently proves capable of threading this tragic understanding beneath the surface of it all. Even in the character’s seemingly most horrific moments, you can see the real Nikki suffering through it all, and this layered performance from Navarrette is truly spellbinding.

1. Male Loneliness Massacre

To circle back to what I mentioned earlier, the aspect of Obsession that I found most interesting is the way it directly engages with the fears, anxieties, and flaws tied to modern young masculinity. Much has been said in recent years about the male loneliness epidemic, where young men are finding it increasingly difficult to build authentic relationships and instead becoming trapped within online echo chambers. Those issues have only been amplified by the rise of AI chatbots and similar technologies, which often prioritize engagement over factual or emotionally healthy interaction.

The result is a widening gap between the internal lives of many young men and the reality around them. Barker’s film, whether intentionally or not, acts as a disturbing encapsulation of that disconnect. It explores how projecting preconceived ideas onto another person can ultimately suffocate them, leaving them trapped beneath someone else’s expectations and fantasies.

In that sense, the film almost feels like a 2026 response to the ideas explored in (500) Days of Summer. By becoming fully immersed in a fabricated version of reality, the central character in Obsession loses sight of what actually makes reality meaningful in the first place. In the process, he not only destroys his own life, but damages the lives of many others around him as well.

---

RGM GRADE

(B)

I liked Obsession quite a bit. It’s a film filled with strong craftsmanship, effective performances, and several genuinely impactful scares. I’m interested to see what Barker does next as he continues to grow as a filmmaker and explore other modern anxieties and fears through his work.

---